N Game: Gravity is overrated. Without it, you could slam dunk a hippopotamus like a basketball, and if you didn't want to do that before you definitely do now. N could totally pull off a hippo-dunk in between platforming for gold bits and avoiding a crazy course of deadly obstacles. We wanna be like N. Free Action Games from AddictingGames. '#GamerGate' is an online movement ostensibly concerned with ethics in game journalism and with protecting the 'gamer' identity.

Until recently, you might have lived a life blissfully unaware of the online #Gamergate movement. But last week, computing giant Intel pulled its ads from an independent game-development site thanks to the gaming lobby. Now that major companies are taking sides, it's time to figure it out. Let us be your guides.

  1. '#GamerGate' is an online movement ostensibly concerned with ethics in game journalism and with protecting the 'gamer' identity.
  2. The Gamergate controversy concerned an online harassment campaign, primarily conducted through the use of the hashtag #GamerGate, that centered on issues of sexism and anti-progressivism in video game culture. Gamergate is used as a blanket term for the controversy as well as for the harassment campaign and actions of those participating in it.

What is #Gamergate?

'#GamerGate' is an online movement ostensibly concerned with ethics in game journalism and with protecting the 'gamer' identity.


Even regarded generously, Gamergate isn't much more than a tone-deaf rabble of angry obsessives with a misguided understanding of journalistic ethics. But there are a lot of reasons not to regard the movement generously.

How did Intel get itself involved?

Intel removed its ads last week from Gamasutra, a niche website for video game developers, at the behest of #Gamergate, which took particular offense to an article by journalist Leigh Alexander arguing that 'gamers,' in the traditional sense, are becoming irrelevant as 'angry young men' grow up and the medium evolves to include new audiences.

That article is over a month old, though.

Right. #Gamergate actually began in August as a pernicious attack on one female game developer, Zoe Quinn, and her sex life.

Quinn has been the victim of death threats and harassment since she began trying to publish Depression Quest, a text-based game partially based on her own experience with depression, in 2013. Last month, the New Yorker attempted to explain why Quinn and her game inspire such outrage among gamers —Depression Quest is not a 'real game,' it's 'just words,' its portrayal of depression is too personal to be relatable—but it's hard not to look at the last several weeks of chatter in the gaming community and not come to the conclusion that it's about the fact that she's a woman.

Why do you say that?

The harassment against her reached a fever pitch in August after an ex-boyfriend, Eron Gjoni, wrote a series of blog posts alleging that Quinn had cheated on him with five other men, some of whom worked in games or games journalism.

In gamer social media circles, a conspiracy immediately took root: Quinn had definitely fucked those five guys, gamers decided (they even turned it into a joke about the burger chain) and she'd done it to get publicity for her games.

Quinn's address and phone number were made public shortly afterward, and the threats against her became so intense that she left her house and started couch-surfing. Last week, the New York Times reported she hasn't been back since.

So Intel pulled its ads from Gamasutra because of a bunch of people attacking a woman after her boyfriend claimed she'd cheated on him?

Well, not quite. In September, the attacks on Quinn coalesced into an organized campaign, coordinated on 4chan, Reddit, YouTube and in various IRC channels. Gamers came to a consensus that publicly harassing a woman over her sex life was a bad look. They quickly pivoted to focus on corruption in games journalism.

They started with Kotaku writer Nathan Grayson, one of the alleged 'five guys,' who stood accused of writing positively about Quinn while engaged in a sexual relationship with her.

But Grayson never reviewed Depression Quest. He once wrote half a sentence about the game, before his relationship with Quinn ever started, but that's it. Critics of Quinn and Grayson have also raised concerns about this Kotaku article—it was written before they started dating.

Despite numerous news sources, including Kotaku itself, debunking the existence of any review, some gamers continue to trot it out as an example of journalistic corruption months later.

(Kotaku and Gawker are sister sites, both owned by Gawker Media LLC.)

Surely the gaming community is not entirely made up of misogynists and angry idiots?

Near the end of August, a significant chunk of the gaming press declared itselffed up with the type of gamer who would make threats against Quinn and other prominent women in games, including controversial feminist critic Anita Sarkeesian.

'There has been so much hate. So many angry words, so many accusations, over...what? Video games? Women in video games? People who write about video games? It would be absurd if it hadn't forced people out of their homes for fear of their personal safety,' wrote Kotaku's Luke Plunkett.

A number of sites took the opportunity to write about a demographic change in the gaming community: The death of the 'gamer,' essentially. Headlines like 'The End of Gamers,' 'Gamers' Are Over,' and 'We Might Be Witnessing the Death of an Identity' appeared on game news sites.

We Might Be Witnessing The 'Death of An Identity'

I've been working at Kotaku for nearly eight years now, and while I've seen some online…

Is that where the hashtag/name #Gamergate came in?

Yes: The #Gamergate movement was born—borrowing a hashtag coined by conservative Firefly actor Adam Baldwin—in response to this widespread repudiation of the term 'gamer' and the scummy layer of misogyny it had picked up.

You said #Gamergate participants believe they're fighting for video game journalism ethics.


Right. #Gamergate participants believe that game journalism has been corrupted—there are too many writers who maintain friendships or other close relationships with game developers.

Never mind for now that the game developers who are most often complained about are people like Zoe Quinn—independent, crowd-funded, and frequently from underrepresented identity groups—#Gamergate's mission (publicly, anyway) is to convince games writers to adopt the same ethical standards as 'real journalists.'

What does that mean?

It's never been clear what that would mean. That's because #Gamergate has never really been about ethics, although some sincere participants have taken up that discussion.

Chat logs released soon after the 'Five Guys scandal' broke reveal the movement was focused on destroying Zoë Quinn first, reforming games reporting second.

Amid discussing the size, shape and smell of Quinn's vagina and what to do with leaked nude photos of her, plotters from various 4chan message boards drop gems like 'i couldnt care less about vidya, i just want to see zoe receive her comeuppance.'

From another conversation:

'I kind of want to just make her life irrepairably [sic] horrible …'

'but what if she suicides …'


N Game Rate Online

Eventually, (slightly) cooler heads prevailed, and the trolls who would soon form #Gamergate shifted their goal from destroying Zoë Quinn to something ostensibly about journalistic ethics.


'The more you try to attack her directly, the more she gets to play the victim card and make a bunch of friends who will support her because, since she has a vagina, any attack is misgony [sic],' one of them reasoned.

So the ethics complaints are a red herring?

Many #Gamergate participants truly believe that they are fighting an important fight against corruption in game journalism. But to an outside observer, it's bizarre that they identify the greatest threat as the small, independent, crowdfunded developers, and not the huge profitable game companies that advertise on game sites.

What about the 'death of the gamer' stuff?

Ethics aren't the only thing #Gamergate is concerned with. As the movement made the shift from ad hominem attacks to insisting that its only interest in Quinn was as an example of nepotism and corruption in the gaming industry, it also began co-opting the language of social justice movements and of journalism to legitimize its complaints.

Although their movement targets women specifically, #Gamergaters insist they speak for a victimized 'demographic,' and that anyone who opposes misogyny while making generalizations about gamers must be a hypocrite. In their letters to advertisers, they argue that every article calling 'gamer' a dead or outdated identity represents a conflict of interest.

That sounds a bit muddled.


Gamergaters demand to be seen simultaneously as a 70-million-strong market force, too big for the industry to ignore, and as a persecuted minority. They warn advertisers it's 'racist' and 'sexist' when a gaming site dares to point out that most angry gamers are young, white, and male. At the same time, they argue that angry, young, white males are those sites' 'target audience,' and writers offend them at their own risk.

It's ironic, then, that #Gamergate is also spamming advertisers with links to Leigh Alexander's highly controversial piece arguing that the stereotypical gamer is no longer the only audience available to the industry.

The epiphany that #Gamergate is fiercely resisting, that games can be by and for people outside the 'target demo,' smells a lot like something advertisers love: potential new customers.

Is #Gamergate all white men?

No: Some women and people of color have expressed varying degrees of support for some components of the movement's aims.

But its most fervent proponents are so desperate to maintain the illusion that they represent an oppressed majority (as if that makes any sense) that they've created copious fake accounts to artificially inflate the size of the movement, and even designed a cartoon female mascot named Vivian James to advance the idea that #notallwomen care about female representation in games.

Has it been successful?

Despite Gamergate's self-contradictory positions, it has managed to get some of what it wanted. Prominent women who make and write about games have been chased out of the industry. Kotaku has banned its writers from contributing to developers on Patreon, a crowdfunding website popular with women in games—notably Gamergate targets Zoë Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian (editor-in-chief Stephen Totilo later clarified that the policy applies to any direct financial support of developers).

And then there's the most recent kerfuffle with Intel.

Doesn't Intel see that it's throwing in its lot with some pretty gross misogyny and ignorance?

Well—after Gaters hailed Intel's decision as a victory for their letter-writing campaign, 'Operation Disrespectful Nod,' the company appeared to realize it had been duped by gamers—and fake gamers—into supporting a misogynist movement.

'[W]e recognize that our action inadvertently created a perception that we are somehow taking sides in an increasingly bitter debate in the gaming community. That was not our intent, and that is not the case … Intel does not support any organization or movement that discriminates against women. We apologize and we are deeply sorry if we offended anyone,' the company said in a statement.

But it stuck by its decision to pull the ads.

Meanwhile, actual ethical problems in games journalism—like corporate influence, for instance—remain unaddressed.

That's probably because the most popular explanation of what #gamergate supporters want has nothing to do with reforming the business of games writing. It's this: They 'just want to play games,' without complicating things by discussing how those games portray women and minorities, or how the industry treats those same groups. Those discussions are fine, they feel, but please don't force them to confront those inconvenient issues or 'shove them down our throats.'

Whether they realize it or not, they've just had what's probably their first real encounter with the concept of 'privilege.' For a very long time, being part of the 'target demo' has meant being able to enjoy games made for (and, for the most part, by) people like you, without ever seeing those games interrogated from another perspective.

Projects like Anita Sarkeesian's 'Tropes vs. Women in Video Games' inspire such vitriol precisely because they've pierced that bubble of privilege and started conversations that gamers can't conveniently ignore. And that can be hard to accept, especially when you identify with a group that has traditionally been at the bottom of the (white, male) social pecking order.

The vile behavior and disingenuous mission of #gamergate makes it easy to forget that, although it may be sheltering a few real sociopaths, we're mostly talking about very young men—kids, in a lot of cases. As Leigh Alexander pointed out, gaming discourse has made it this far because 'most of the people who drove [the game industry's] revenues in the past have grown up.'

That doesn't excuse the damage #gamergate has done, but it does offer a thread of hope that this current crop of angry young men will grow up, too, and learn to enjoy a brave new gaming world that isn't all about them.

We can hope, right?

[Illustration by Jim Cooke]

(Redirected from Gamergate)

GamerGate is a consumer revolt against unethical practices in video game journalism and entertainment media, including (but not limited to) corruption and conflicts of interest, collusion, and the censorship of ideas and discussion. It is comprised of video game enthusiasts all over the world working together to eliminate ethical misconduct by industry professionals and promote fair and balanced video games media.

As a group, GamerGate is leaderless and unstructured so all efforts and projects are collaborative endeavors agreed upon and fulfilled by the group’s majority.

  • 4Further Reading

The Three C's of GamerGate


The multiple journalistic failings that GamerGate has exposed and challenged can be summarized and sorted into the following three categories:

  • Corruption
    • Conflicts of interest (COIs), including the non-disclosure of personal relationships (romantic and otherwise), non-disclosure of direct financial support and/or investments, and the non-disclosure of Patreon contributions.
    • Cronyism
    • Bribes and similar enticements (or threats and similar intimidation tactics) towards reviewers to grant games a better score then they deserve.
  • Collusion
    • Secret cooperation of supposed competing outlets to push (or silence) a message or narrative.
    • Industry-wide blacklisting
  • Censorship
    • Wide-spread prohibition of GamerGate and GamerGate-related topics on forums and comment sections.
    • Abuse of DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) takedown measures
    • Social media blockbots and shadow-bans
    • Attempts to ban or censor video games based on content

Endeavors, Achievements, & Criticism

GamerGate strives to find and expose unethical practices in video game journalism, communicate the desire for better ethics and representation, and inspire and foster positive change in the video game industry. The #GamerGate hashtag on Twitter is the primary medium for communication and collaboration, and websites like 8chan, Reddit, and Tumblr boast high numbers of participants and supporters as well.

Because GamerGate has no defined structure, much of the communication and messages directed towards developers, publishers, and journalists are done on an individual basis. However, GamerGate participants will frequently come together to collaborate on campaigns, referred to as operations.

The largest and most successful operation, Operation Disrespectful Nod, resulted in many different companies pulling their ads from sites that practiced unethical journalism, made no efforts to improve upon confrontation, and/or directly insulted their customer base through open disdain and mockery of gamers. Other operations have resulted in the direct improvement of gaming journalism. The Rebuild Initiative has given greater exposure to quality gaming media sites and strengthened the relationship between developers and gamers, and Operation UV directly influenced the enhancement of FTC rules regarding affiliate advertising and prompted websites to place disclaimers on paid advertisements disguised as articles.[1][2]

Despite GamerGate’s positive changes on the industry, it has been met with heavy criticism from the journalists and publications under fire and their supporters, as well as third-wave feminists involved who have attributed the harsh criticism towards female offenders to misogyny and sexism. Additionally, due to the unstructured and anonymous nature of GamerGate, many individuals have taken advantage of the lack of accountability and have trolled and displayed abusive behavior towards members of the video game industry, notably women. As a result of all of this, GamerGate’s detractors have commonly referred the revolt as a 'misogynistic hate campaign' run by straight white males who want to drive women out of gaming. However, statistics[3] show that this interpretation is patently false, and the existence of #NotYourShield suggests that GamerGate's demographics are far more diverse than its critics imply.


N Gamerate N

For a more detailed account of the origins and history of GamerGate, please read the History of GamerGate article.
For a comprehensive timeline of GamerGate, please refer to the Timeline.

The events leading up to the creation of GamerGate began on August 16, 2014, with the publication of 'thezoepost' by Eron Gjoni, an ex-boyfriend of indie game developer Zoe Quinn.[4] The blog post outlined Quinn’s emotional abuse and infidelity, but what gamers took immediate notice of was the fact that Quinn, a developer, had engaged in romantic/sexual relations with industry professionals who had the potential to promote her and her work, including Nathan Grayson and Joshua Boggs. Discussion erupted on social media and various gaming websites, as suspicions of corruption and cronyism in the video game industry had already been present and thezoepost seemed to be a solid confirmation of those suspicions.

Most attempts to discuss these revelations online were silenced through thread deletions, DMCA video takedowns, and shadow-banning, but the attempts to silence conversation on the subject inadvertently caused a Streisand Effect and the topic spread. The publication of thezoepost, the impact it made in gaming circles, and the internet-wide attempts at smothering discussion of it is referred to as the Zoe Quinn Scandal.

As the scale and impact of the scandal grew, gaming journalists were placed under increased scrutiny by their readers, and many conflicts-of-interest were discovered and spread. In late August, actor Adam Baldwin coined the hashtag '#GamerGate' in response to the deluge of exposed breaches in video game journalism[5], a hashtag that was quickly adopted by those arguing for better ethics. Shortly after, the coordinated Gamers are Dead media campaign began, with several different outlets posting articles decrying gamers, gamer culture, and the gamer lifestyle all within the same 24 hour period. The timing of the articles and the united message they spread caused #GamerGate supporters to immediately suspect collusion, which was all but confirmed in September 2014 with the revealing of the secret GameJournoPros group.[6]

Over time, the hashtag #GamerGate evolved to become the consumer revolt known as GamerGate.

Further Reading


Title Author (Publisher) Summary
#GamerGate Is Not A Hate Group, It's A Consumer Movement
Erik Kain (Forbes)
Gamergate: Why gaming journalists keep dragging Zoe Quinn’s sex life into the spotlight
Noah Dulis (Breitbart)
A People's History of #GamerGate
Gurney Halleck
My letter to Jason Schreier about GamerGate & ethics
#GamerGate: Part I: Sex, Lies, and Gender Games
Cathy Young (Reason)
#GamerGate: Primer/Finale
#GamerGate – An Issue With Two Sides
Allum Bokhari (TechCrunch)


Title Author (Publisher) Summary
#GamerGate explained in five minutes or your money back
So, what exactly is #GamerGate?
So. You discovered #GamerGate.


Title Author (Publisher) Summary
#GamerGate in 60 Seconds
The Evidence and History of #GamerGate
#GamerGate: TotalBiscuit on Ethics, Was Offered Free Stuff for Reviews
David Pakman w/ John Bain (The David Pakman Show)
#GamerGate Crush Saga: Episode One
Erik Kain w/ Greg Tito, John Bain, & Janelle Bonanno
HuffPost Live: 3 Strong Women Of #GamerGate Fight Back!
Ricky Camilleri w/ Georgina Young, Jennie Bharaj, and Jemma Morgan (Huffington Post)
#GAMERGATE! Gamer's fight back! Guest video by TheInvestigamer!

See Also


GamerGate Achievements

The GamerGate OP

N Gamerate Auto


  1. - 'Important Update: The FTC Heard Our Complaints. They Are Going to Issue Revised Disclosure Guidelines for Affiliate Links and You Tubers. We've Been Instrumental in Making Real, Lasting Positive Changes to Online Journalism - TheChiefLunatic - November 14 2014' Reddit - (archive)
  2. - 'FTC Forces Gawker’s Kotaku To make Disclosures for Affiliate Links - Georgina Young - November 27 2014' TechRaptor - (archive)
  3. - 'An Actual Statistical Analysis of #GamerGate? - jw - October 25 2014' Medium - (archive)
  4. - 'thezoepost – Eron Gjoni – August 16 2014' Wordpress - (archive)
  5. - '#GamerGate: - Adam Baldwin - August 27 2014' Twitter - (archive)
  6. - 'Exposed: The Secret Mailing List of the Gaming Journalism Elite. - Milo Yiannopoulos - September 17 2014' Breitbart London - (archive)
Retrieved from 'https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php?title=GamerGate&oldid=8595'